Performance Development

The performance management plan was designed to:

​

• Drive Continuous Improvement: Encourage employees to seek and act on feedback regularly, improving their skills and performance.
   

• Enhance Transparency: Create a clear and structured process for evaluating performance, tied directly to promotion and merit-based pay.
   

• Align with Business Goals: Ensure individual performance goals are aligned with the company’s overall strategic objectives.

​

A key aspect of the plan was the emphasis on regular, ongoing feedback:

​

• Continuous Feedback Culture: The plan promoted a shift from annual reviews to ongoing feedback, encouraging managers and employees to have regular check-ins.
   

• Real-Time Adjustments: Regular feedback enabled real-time adjustments to performance and allowed employees to correct course before formal reviews.
   

• Employee Development: This approach fostered a growth mindset, where employees continuously worked on their development, rather than waiting for formal evaluation periods.

To promote self-awareness and ownership over performance:

​

• Structured Self-Assessment: Employees were asked to complete self-evaluations, reflecting on their own achievements, challenges, and areas for development. These evaluations encouraged employees to take an active role in their growth.
   

• Goal Setting: The self-evaluation process included setting personal and professional goals, which helped employees map out their development plan and areas where they could contribute more effectively.

A holistic view of performance was provided through 360-degree feedback:

​

• Peer and Team Feedback: Colleagues across departments provided anonymous feedback on collaboration, communication, and leadership skills. This helped paint a fuller picture of how employees are perceived in their daily interactions.
   

• Cross-Functional Input: The inclusion of feedback from peers, subordinates, and even clients allowed for a well-rounded assessment, ensuring no blind spots in performance.
   

• Development Focused: Feedback was positioned as a development tool rather than solely for evaluation, helping employees identify key growth areas.

Manager evaluations formed the core of the performance management process:

​

• Manager Assessments: Managers conducted formal performance reviews, providing feedback on job-specific competencies, goal attainment, and overall contributions.
   

• Alignment with Business Goals: Managers ensured that individual performance was directly aligned with the company’s larger objectives, helping employees see how their work impacts the organization.
   

• Feedback Sessions: In addition to annual reviews, managers held quarterly feedback sessions to ensure ongoing communication about performance and goals, emphasizing a culture of continuous improvement.

To foster a culture of transparency and continuous improvement, the performance management plan also included a process for direct reports to provide feedback to their managers. This step emphasized the importance of reciprocal feedback in leadership, ensuring that managers are not only reviewing their teams but are also open to growth through feedback from their direct reports.

​

• Anonymous Up-Level Feedback: Employees were given the opportunity to provide anonymous feedback to their managers, ensuring that feedback could be open and honest without fear of repercussions.
   

• Start, Stop, Continue Framework: Direct reports were asked to provide one suggestion in each of the following areas:

  • Start: A behavior, action, or leadership style the manager could begin incorporating to improve their effectiveness (e.g., “Start holding more team-building activities”).

  • Stop: A behavior that may be hindering team dynamics or performance that the manager could stop doing (e.g., “Stop sending last-minute requests with tight deadlines”).

  • Continue: Positive behaviors or practices the manager should keep doing that are contributing to a healthy work environment (e.g., “Continue offering regular one-on-one meetings for support”).
     

• Development for Managers: The feedback was framed as a tool for manager development, providing leaders with valuable insights from their team on how to enhance their leadership style.
   

• Actionable Insights: Managers were encouraged to reflect on the feedback and incorporate the suggestions into their leadership approach, making changes that would benefit the team and improve overall morale.

Performance evaluations were directly tied to promotion and compensation decisions:

​

• Promotion Criteria: Employees who demonstrated consistent high performance, leadership potential, and alignment with company values were considered for promotion based on review outcomes.
   

• Merit-Based Increases: Performance ratings were linked to merit increases, ensuring that top performers were rewarded for their contributions. Employees who exceeded expectations were eligible for higher pay raises.
   

• Career Development Plans: Employees were also given access to tailored development plans to prepare for future promotion opportunities, aligning their personal growth with company needs.

• Improved Performance Clarity: Employees had a clearer understanding of what was expected, and how their performance aligned with promotion opportunities and merit increases.
   

• Increased Employee Engagement: The emphasis on continuous feedback and development led to higher employee engagement and satisfaction.
   

• Performance-Driven Culture: The new system reinforced a performance-driven culture, where employees were motivated to improve and advance within the company.